Citatio: D. Groddek, hethiter.net/: grodlist s.v. KBo 17.32 (v. 0.7)
Literatur zu KBo 17.32:
D. Groddek, DBH 31, unter Nr. 73
S. Heinhold-Krahmer et al., THeth 9, 171, 183, 222, 237
(+) J.L. Miller, ZA 98 (2008), 236 A. 75
P. Cornil, Hethitica 7 (1987), 37
(+) J.L. Miller, 7. IKH, Bd. I, 503
(“250/g”(+) PIHANS 119, 95
E. Neu, Hethitica 6 (1985), 157 A. 8
A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 79, 91-93, 98-99
A. Kammenhuber, THeth 19/II, 513, 514, 515
Vs. 3.5.6 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
Vs. 4ff. HW2 II, 20a-20b
Vs. 4.18 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
Vs. 5 J. Boley, IBS 79, § 2.1b.2
Vs. 6f. HW2 III/1, 30b
Vs. 6 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 90
7 F. Starke, StBoT 23, Nr. 326
Vs. 7 HW2 I, 273b
Vs. 7 J. Puhvel, HED I/II, 251
Vs. 8 J. Boley, IBS 79, under q. 38
Vs. 9 P. Cotticelli, Mat.Heth. Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 5
Vs. 10 H. Eichner, MSS 28 (1970), 13 A. 2
10 S. Alp, HBM, 336
10 N. Oettinger, 7. Fachtagung (1985), 310 A. 53
Vs. 10 K. Yoshida, 3. IKH, 612
Vs. 10f. HW2 III/1, 166a
(+) Vs. 10 H. Marquardt, DBH 34, 85
Vs. 10 J. Puhvel, HED III, 104
Vs. 10 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 84, 85
Vs. 10 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 10, 111
Vs. 11 H.C. Melchert, IF 85 (1980), 91
11 H. Otten, StBoT 17, 31 A. 58
11 K. Yoshida, StBoT 45, 721
11 K. Yoshida, 5. IKH, 791 A. 11
Vs. 11 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
11 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
12 H. Eichner, Num., 88
I 12 H. Berman, Diss., 111
Vs. 12 H.A. Hoffner/H.C. Melchert, LANE 1/I, 162
12 E. Neu, StBoT 32, 268
Vs. 12 H.A. Hoffner, FS Dinçol, 331
Vs. 12 H.C. Melchert, TIES 9 (2000), 69
Vs. 12 J. Puhvel, IBS 35, 351
Vs. 12 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 31
Vs. 12 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85/86
Vs. 12 HW2 V, 45a
13 H. Otten, RlA VI 344 s.v. Kunuštalla
Vs. 13 P. Taracha, CHANE 5, 189 A. 105
13 J. Tischler, HEG I, 636
Vs. 13 H.C. Melchert, CLL, 109
Vs. 13 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, I, 250, 253
Vs. 13 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 255
13 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 98
14 H. Otten, StBoT 17, 41
Vs. 14 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 122 A. 291
Vs. 14 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, I, 407
Vs. 14 J. Tischler, HEG II, 1161
Vs. 14 F. Starke, ZA 69 (1979), 55
Vs. 14 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85, 88
15 E. Neu, KZ 93 (1979), 80
15 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 46
Vs. 15 HW2 III/1, 195a
(+) 15 C. Brosch, Topoi 19, 5
Vs. 15 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
(= 2541/c) 16 E. Neu, StBoT 5, 122
(= 2541/c) 16 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
Vs. 16 J. Puhvel, HED VII, 30
17.18 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 30
Vs. 17 F. Pecchioli Daddi, Mestieri, 485
Vs. 17 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
Vs. 19 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, II, 923/924
Vs. 19 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
21 E. Neu, KZ 93 (1979), 72
Vs. 21 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
D. Groddek, DBH 31, unter Nr. 73
S. Heinhold-Krahmer et al., THeth 9, 171, 183, 222, 237
(+) J.L. Miller, ZA 98 (2008), 236 A. 75
P. Cornil, Hethitica 7 (1987), 37
(+) J.L. Miller, 7. IKH, Bd. I, 503
(“250/g”(+) PIHANS 119, 95
E. Neu, Hethitica 6 (1985), 157 A. 8
A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 79, 91-93, 98-99
A. Kammenhuber, THeth 19/II, 513, 514, 515
Vs. 3.5.6 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
Vs. 4ff. HW2 II, 20a-20b
Vs. 4.18 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
Vs. 5 J. Boley, IBS 79, § 2.1b.2
Vs. 6f. HW2 III/1, 30b
Vs. 6 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 90
7 F. Starke, StBoT 23, Nr. 326
Vs. 7 HW2 I, 273b
Vs. 7 J. Puhvel, HED I/II, 251
Vs. 8 J. Boley, IBS 79, under q. 38
Vs. 9 P. Cotticelli, Mat.Heth. Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 5
Vs. 10 H. Eichner, MSS 28 (1970), 13 A. 2
10 S. Alp, HBM, 336
10 N. Oettinger, 7. Fachtagung (1985), 310 A. 53
Vs. 10 K. Yoshida, 3. IKH, 612
Vs. 10f. HW2 III/1, 166a
(+) Vs. 10 H. Marquardt, DBH 34, 85
Vs. 10 J. Puhvel, HED III, 104
Vs. 10 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 84, 85
Vs. 10 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 10, 111
Vs. 11 H.C. Melchert, IF 85 (1980), 91
11 H. Otten, StBoT 17, 31 A. 58
11 K. Yoshida, StBoT 45, 721
11 K. Yoshida, 5. IKH, 791 A. 11
Vs. 11 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
11 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
12 H. Eichner, Num., 88
I 12 H. Berman, Diss., 111
Vs. 12 H.A. Hoffner/H.C. Melchert, LANE 1/I, 162
12 E. Neu, StBoT 32, 268
Vs. 12 H.A. Hoffner, FS Dinçol, 331
Vs. 12 H.C. Melchert, TIES 9 (2000), 69
Vs. 12 J. Puhvel, IBS 35, 351
Vs. 12 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 31
Vs. 12 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85/86
Vs. 12 HW2 V, 45a
13 H. Otten, RlA VI 344 s.v. Kunuštalla
Vs. 13 P. Taracha, CHANE 5, 189 A. 105
13 J. Tischler, HEG I, 636
Vs. 13 H.C. Melchert, CLL, 109
Vs. 13 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, I, 250, 253
Vs. 13 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 255
13 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 98
14 H. Otten, StBoT 17, 41
Vs. 14 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 122 A. 291
Vs. 14 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, I, 407
Vs. 14 J. Tischler, HEG II, 1161
Vs. 14 F. Starke, ZA 69 (1979), 55
Vs. 14 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85, 88
15 E. Neu, KZ 93 (1979), 80
15 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 46
Vs. 15 HW2 III/1, 195a
(+) 15 C. Brosch, Topoi 19, 5
Vs. 15 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
(= 2541/c) 16 E. Neu, StBoT 5, 122
(= 2541/c) 16 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
Vs. 16 J. Puhvel, HED VII, 30
17.18 E. Neu, StBoT 18, 30
Vs. 17 F. Pecchioli Daddi, Mestieri, 485
Vs. 17 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 86
Vs. 19 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, II, 923/924
Vs. 19 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 99
21 E. Neu, KZ 93 (1979), 72
Vs. 21 A. Kammenhuber, MSS 29 (1971), 85
Gerfrid G.W. Müller -- 2008- 2024